PlanetOfBets In-play (Live) betting.Cryptocurrency betting.Fixed odds betting (primary focus). | |
---|---|
Daily visits Estimated daily visits to PlanetOfBets based on a third-party data source. All bookmaker's domains are calculated cumulatively.
| 2,050 |
Global rank Global rank of PlanetOfBets according to the daily visits and its change over the past 3 months.
| 533. 86 |
Target region Geographical focus of PlanetOfBets. All bookmaker's domains are considered cumulatively.
| International |
Basic Facts |
|||||||
User rating Average overall rating of PlanetOfBets based on the feedback collected from users. A minimum of 10 ratings is required. |
3.3
144 ratings |
||||||
Compared to average Overall rating of PlanetOfBets compared to the average bookmaker. |
6% above average see details |
||||||
User feedback Number of user ratings, comments and reviews collected for PlanetOfBets. |
144 27 8 | ||||||
Year established Year in which PlanetOfBets was founded. |
2006 | ||||||
Owner Company owning PlanetOfBets. |
Planet of Bets Entertainment B.V. | ||||||
Licence Jurisdictions where PlanetOfBets has obtained and holds the licence for online sports betting. |
Curacao | ||||||
Bettors from | Loading... | ||||||
Website and Applications |
|||||||
Domains Domains used by PlanetOfBets to provide sports betting services. |
planetofbets.*
|
||||||
Languages Languages supported on PlanetOfBets website. |
English, Russian, Spanish, Ukrainian | ||||||
Banking and Betting |
|||||||
Currencies Currencies supported on PlanetOfBets website. |
Armenian Dram, Azerbaijani Manat, Brazilian Real, Belarusian Ruble, Swiss Franc, Danish Krone, Euro, British Pound, Hong Kong Dollar, Indonesian Rupiah, Japanese Yen, Kazakhstani Tenge, Moldovan Leu, Malaysian Ringgit , Nigerian Naira, Norwegian Krone, Phillipine Peso, Chinese Renminbi, Russian Ruble, Swedish Krona, Thai Baht, Tajikistani Somoni, Turkish Lira, Ukrainian Hryvnia, American Dollar, Uzbekistani Som, Vietnamese Dong | ||||||
Payment options Payment options accepted on PlanetOfBets website. |
ecoPayz, MasterCard, Perfect Money, QIWI, Visa, WebMoney | ||||||
Crypto payment options Crypto payment options accepted on PlanetOfBets website. |
Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Dash, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Tether, TRON, XRP | ||||||
Odds formats Formats used by PlanetOfBets to display the odds on betting events. |
EU | ||||||
Sports Sports offered for betting on PlanetOfBets website. |
American football, Basketball, Darts, Handball, Ice hockey, Martial arts, Rugby, Snooker, Soccer, Tennis, Volleyball | ||||||
Strengths and Weaknessesbased on feedback collected from users |
|
Strongest sides of PlanetOfBets based on feedback collected from users. Significant strengthsN/A |
Significant Weaknesses
Weakest sides of PlanetOfBets based on feedback collected from users. promotions |
Other strong sides of PlanetOfBets based on feedback collected from users. Moderate strengthsN/A |
Moderate Weaknesses
Other weak sides of PlanetOfBets based on feedback collected from users. sports coverage odds quality |
Overall qualitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
Overall Quality Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the overall quality of PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
35%
8% 28% 6% 22%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Website lookbased on feedback collected from users |
|
3% above average
Website Look Ratings
Distribution of the ratings regarding the visual appeal of PlanetOfBets website, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
38%
31% 8% 8% 15%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Website usabilitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
8% below average
Website Usability Ratings
Distribution of the ratings regarding the navigation and content organization of PlanetOfBets website, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
20%
50% 0% 0% 30%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Website functionalitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
same as average
Website functionality Ratings
Distribution of the ratings regarding the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of PlanetOfBets website, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
54%
23% 0% 0% 23%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Sports coveragebased on feedback collected from users |
|
16% below average
Sports Coverage Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
10%
30% 30% 20% 10%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Markets coveragebased on feedback collected from users |
|
3% below average
Markets Coverage Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the variety of betting markets offered by PlanetOfBets on one event, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
25%
33% 8% 0% 33%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Odds qualitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
17% below average
Odds quality Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the quality of betting odds offered by PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
10%
30% 20% 30% 10%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Betting limitsbased on feedback collected from users |
|
same as average
Betting Limits Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the maximum betting limits of PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
27%
36% 9% 9% 18%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Live bettingbased on feedback collected from users |
|
not enough ratings
N/A Live Betting Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the live (in-play, in-running) betting service of PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
29%
29% 14% 14% 14%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Customer Servicebased on feedback collected from users |
|
9% below average
Customer Service Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the customer service quality of PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
25%
8% 17% 42% 8%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Bonuses and promotionsbased on feedback collected from users |
|
21% below average
Bonuses and Promotions Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the bonuses and promotions offered by PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
25%
8% 0% 8% 58%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
Safety and fairnessbased on feedback collected from users |
|
3% above average
Safety and Fairness Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the safety, fairness and overall credibility of PlanetOfBets, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
36%
14% 14% 14% 21%
PlanetOfBets Average
|
|
N/A | 5 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 197.210.*.* | |
N/A | 5 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 176.126.*.* | |
Munye | 1 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 89.240.*.* | |
cot | 1 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 82.161.*.* | |
mackie | 4 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 81.136.*.* | |
hutchie | 4 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 216.169.*.* | |
rick | 4 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 81.151.*.* | |
Henry-VIII | 4 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 69.22.*.* | |
mr-prasad | 4 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 69.22.*.* | |
elle | 1 |
Rating submitted in: ● User's IP address: 86.130.*.* | |
Poff1987 I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Dec 22, 2017 ● User's IP address: 5.20.*.* |
I like this betting site. Paying fast, everything is OK. |
kamisama I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Apr 12, 2016 ● User's IP address: 202.166.*.* |
Well I like PlanetOfBets a lot than any other bookmaker website. Website is simple without any advertisements. Depositing money and withdrawing money is comparatively faster than any other bookmaker website and customer support is good. |
totoboy I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Mar 24, 2016 ● User's IP address: 5.79.*.* |
Planet of Bets don't offer a welcome bonus at this moment. Only in three languages and a website which is not too fancy. They are around for 9 years now but not the bookmaker for me. Their service don't always answer that quickly and their payouts aren't fast either. We have more then enough from this bookmakers so go look around for another bookie. |
oceanwave I like this |
Review submitted in: N/A ● Date: Mar 6, 2016 ● User's IP address: 197.210.*.* |
To us Nigerians I believe this is one of our best bookies to start with their diverse deposit options that accept our jurisdiction, with prompt payout, that's my opinion. |
MSerg I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Sep 21, 2015 ● User's IP address: 79.183.*.* |
Bitcoin deposits, fast payouts and friendly technical support. However, I would like more betting lines for tennis, as well as the addition of new sports in Live. Deposits would be better with a new payment system. |
TeamPH I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Jun 1, 2014 ● User's IP address: 121.54.*.* |
They did not pay me for my commissions and they SCAMMED all my referrals, they didn't allow them to withdraw to get their profit otherwise they blocked all their accounts. |
clickmaster I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Dec 12, 2013 ● User's IP address: 49.244.*.* |
Best betting site so far. Layout is simple without advertisements and above all the system is fast and never delayed. This is my view others may dislike this site but I like it. |
anders I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Jun 19, 2013 ● User's IP address: 81.101.*.* |
Customer service can only be reached by email which is a major minus point, odds could be a lot better, payout times acceptable. Only photo id and utility bill is needed to cash out. Satisfactory end-user experience, no issues depositing or placing bets. Disliked the nondescript image of the site. |
chinko I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Jun 13, 2013 ● User's IP address: 46.65.*.* |
I took the trouble to open an account and noticed they were based offshore afterwards. This immediately rang alarm bells in my head as to some kind of scam bookie, their odds didn't look too competitive and their small print looked a bit off-putting. It is obvious to me they were looking for idiots who didn't bother to read it. So needless to say I ended up giving it a miss. |
phil I like this |
Review submitted in: ● Date: Jun 8, 2013 ● User's IP address: 91.224.*.* |
Another crap bookie. You go and open an account with them, send perfectly clear and legible id for verification and the stupid idiots write back and say it's not clear enough, send a clearer copy. You send the clearer copy, then they write back saying your account is permanently closed. They spend a fortune advertising, then when they get business, they throw it away. Don't waste your time, I wasted mine so you don't have to. I give this bookie a low rating for the above reason and that is my major dislike. I like the fact they won't cost me any money or cause me any financial risk though. |
mr-prasad | 3 |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 69.22.*.* | |
Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 3 |
Plain, practical and a little on the boring side, but it works fine. | |
Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
User friendly site, locating what you wanted to view was quick and easy. | |
Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 5 |
The pages load very fast, most notably the home page which took 3 seconds to load, the links to pages, surprisingly were slightly slower at 4 seconds. | |
Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 4 |
Events coverage was fairly good, but not as good as many other bookies like Ladbrokes, Corals, etc. | |
Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 4 |
A pretty extensive selection of bets on other markets in the same selection, I couldn't find an item worth backing though. | |
Live betting Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's live (in-play, in-running) betting service. | 2 |
I thought it was better not to bet again with it after using it once. Not that good and liable to inaccuracies. | |
Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 2 |
Another reason I stopped using them is it was too hard to find good odds. | |
Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 4 |
Heres what the company says in relation to its limits on max bet:The maximum amount of the winning at one bet is 360,000 RUR. (100,000 UAH, 15,000 USD, 12,000 EUR). The maximum winning coefficient at one bet is 1000. In the event of its excess payment shall be made at coefficient of 1000. In any time all the limitations specified in this clause can be changed by the Company in competition as well as individually for the participants of the bet. Calculation of the bets which were taken earlier shall be made on the previous terms. | |
Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 3 |
No live chat that I could see. At present they are not providing support by phone in English language. | |
Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 1 |
I didn't come across any bonuses or promo offers, but check the site as the situation can change from time to time. | |
Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 3 |
A lot of off-putting terms and conditions, but moderately safe is my personal gut feeling. | |
rick | |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 81.151.*.* | |
mackie | 3 |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 81.136.*.* | |
Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 2 |
Nothing fantabulous to look at, but it all works without too much bother. | |
Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
I could deposit without error messages or delay and getting on the bets could all be done at the click of a mouse, I thought it was a very user friendly website which is a pleasure to use. | |
Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
From one link to another takes around 8 seconds. | |
Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 2 |
Only about 5 event types, they tried to cover this up by using fancy looking pictorial links to each event type, this might look technically advanced, but bottom line they only have 5 event types. | |
Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 4 |
Often as many as 30 options in what bets they do have available, limited as they may be. | |
Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 2 |
Odds need improving, but were quite good (relatively speaking) in correct score betting. | |
Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 3 |
Average sort of limits as to what you can stake. | |
Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 2 |
Phone support is not in English, well that's something they should change with immediate effect, after all English is the mother tongue of the world and secondly most widely spoken to Chinese. Email support is in English fortunately, but no live chat. | |
Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 2 |
I did not see any bonus offers. | |
Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 2 |
Careful, they are based in some laxly regulated offshore location called the British Virgin Islands. | |
Henry-VIII | |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 69.22.*.* | |
cot | 2 |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 82.161.*.* | |
Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
Very poor. It's simple and confusing. | |
Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
Terrible. You have to find your way and really have to search for e. G. Live betting or the competition that you are looking for. | |
Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
Lacking. No good overview of different sports and competitions. Terrible to find your way in live betting. | |
Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 3 |
They have a good coverage of different sports and many leagues within those sports. | |
Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 3 |
Good, also at lower competitions they offer good side bets like over/under goals or half time winner. | |
Live betting Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's live (in-play, in-running) betting service. | 3 |
Hard to find your way within live betting. Though they offer many soccer matches but less tennis and basketball. | |
Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 2 |
Odds are below average. Around @1. 83/@1. 83 for over/under goals. | |
Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 2 |
PlanetofBets offers you the possibility to make a good bet at a match. For big players I would search for another bookmaker. | |
Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 2 |
Normal service. They help you out within 2 days. | |
Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 1 |
There is no sign up bonus at this moment. | |
Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 1 |
PlanetofBets is not for the big player. I wouldn't try to win big money here. | |
hutchie | 3 |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 216.169.*.* | |
elle | 2 |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 86.130.*.* | |
Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
Very nice looking site with thoughtful design and layout. Nice photos of sexy looking footballers, LOL from Elle. | |
Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
It took a lot of working out, not very self explanatory. | |
Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
Link obscurely arranged. It worked OK when you sorted out how to do it. | |
Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 3 |
Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 1 |
I was unable to find any such markets. | |
Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 3 |
Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 5 |
I was only doing a tiny amount of recreational betting here though, it could be different if you were arbing. | |
Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 2 |
Technical support is in the UK, which is a good thing for me anyway, if I get any problems, anything else is only by email or call to British Virgin Islands, which could be costly. Email response times not as fast as they could be. | |
Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 1 |
None seen so far. | |
Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 2 |
I would feel uncomfortable about doing any more than 20 euros deposit. | |
Munye | 1 |
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 89.240.*.* | |
Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 1 |
Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 1 |