|
The following comments were submitted by users and may contain inaccurate or outdated information. |
1 |
2012-01-09 |
|
Romania |
79.117.***.*** |
|
|
|||
mihaianude |
Betinternet is not a big bookmaker, but you can use it without problems. I didn't use it for a long time but I had no problems. Unfortunately, I didn't make a withdrawal but I think that there are no problems. If you have much money, choose another bookmaker because Betinternet has no high limits. | ||||||||
2 |
2011-12-08 |
|
United Kingdom |
90.208.***.*** |
|
|
|||
alankey |
A good and reliable bookie who pay out winnings without too much agg, may ask for id but that's normal enough these days. Odds are good enough, bonus program is simple and straightforward both in t and c's and simplicity to redeem. Site easy and straightforward to use, professional and friendly sort of staff always on hand to answer your queries. | ||||||||
3 |
2011-11-30 |
|
United Kingdom |
81.6.***.** |
|
|
|||
toni |
Odds are OK-ish could be better, account login is by computer generated number that you may need to keep a note of, which is a bit more cumbersome than just typing in your verbal written login. Staff polite and helpful enough, payout times OK but fractionally below average. Still good all in all. | ||||||||
4 |
2011-11-29 |
|
United Kingdom |
83.217.***.*** |
|
|
|||
poirot |
Sure they're OK, their odds are good enough although not the best in the business. Staff respond quickly enough to emails, etc and are informative and helpful. Payout times reasonable enough. I don't see why not to try them out if you want. | ||||||||
5 |
2011-11-28 |
|
United Kingdom |
80.7.**.*** |
|
|
|||
stee |
Quick payouts with not even id required is a good thing about these people, odds could be little improved but acceptable. Staff quick to respond to emails or you can phone them. But it will cost you the price of an international call to malta. Good enough but room for improvement. | ||||||||
6 |
2011-11-25 |
|
United Kingdom |
81.101.***.*** |
|
|
|||
teggsie |
Based on the tiny British Garison of Malta, this bookie offers a reasonably good range of competitive prices, good welcome bonus to the newcomer and good selection of sporting events on which to bet. To redeem your welcome offer, you simply place one bet up to 25 pounds and they match it up with a free bet afterwards, which to redeem simply type the promo code BETINT50 into the box, enter this same code on registration and bob's your uncle for the welcome bonus. | ||||||||
7 |
2011-11-24 |
|
United Kingdom |
86.29.***.** |
|
|
|||
gabriella |
Another maltese bookie, I believe it's run by those germans in malta that run bet at home, a very similar sort of site, odds could be better, site easy enough to use, was often necessary to get onto chat to sort out little betting problems like error messages when trying to redeem bonuses, bets not getting accepted because I was staking too much, but at least they agreed to let me stake the amount I wanted after negotiation, whereas if you get limited by most bookies they refuse to budge and just say it's a final decision made by our traders, here you can negotiate your way out of account limiting more easily. | ||||||||
8 |
2011-11-23 |
|
United Kingdom |
91.224.**.*** |
|
|
|||
zurra |
Similar to bet-at-home, could possibly be run by the same people. When you open an account, make a note of the number and keep it in a safe place as they're very easy to forget. Goodish sort of odds, responsive customer service, security on the lax side, until it matters, but not awkward or overburdensome to deal with by any means. | ||||||||
9 |
2011-11-18 |
|
United Kingdom |
86.144.***.** |
|
|
|||
tubbyshark |
All in all satisfactory to deal with, odds OK, customer service OK, payout times and not too much red tape getting paid OK, all in all an average type of bookie all in all A OK. | ||||||||
10 |
2011-11-16 |
|
United Kingdom |
86.25.**.** |
|
|
|||
jay |
Good welcome bonuses, reasonable odds and quick response time to emails. They have a chat system which is good, better than having to phone. So deserves about a 3 all in all i think. | ||||||||



















