BetClic  In-play (Live) betting.Fixed odds betting (primary focus). | |
|---|---|
| Daily visits Estimated daily visits to BetClic based on a third-party data source. All bookmaker's domains are calculated cumulatively.
| 257,000 |
| Global rank Global rank of BetClic according to the daily visits and its change over the past 3 months.
| 51. 2 |
| Target region Geographical focus of BetClic. All bookmaker's domains are considered cumulatively.
| Poland + International |
Basic Facts |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| User rating Average overall rating of BetClic based on the feedback collected from users. A minimum of 10 ratings is required. |
2.9
232 ratings |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Compared to average Overall rating of BetClic compared to the average bookmaker. |
6% below average see details |
||||||||||||||||||||
| User feedback Number of user ratings, comments and reviews collected for BetClic. |
232 44 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Year established Year in which BetClic was founded. |
2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Owner Company owning BetClic. |
Mangas Gaming Malta Limited | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Licences Jurisdictions where BetClic has obtained and holds the licence for online sports betting. |
France, Italy, Malta, Poland, Portugal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Bettors from | Loading... | ||||||||||||||||||||
Website and Applications |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Domains Domains used by BetClic to provide sports betting services. |
betclic.*
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Languages Languages supported on BetClic website. |
Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish | ||||||||||||||||||||
Geographical Focus |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Banking and Betting |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Currencies Currencies supported on BetClic website. |
Euro, British Pound, Hungarian Forint, Polish Zloty | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment options Payment options accepted on BetClic website. |
Bank Transfer, Maestro, MasterCard, Neteller, paysafecard, Skrill, Visa, Visa Electron | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Odds formats Formats used by BetClic to display the odds on betting events. |
EU, UK | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sports Sports offered for betting on BetClic website. |
American football, Athletics, Aussie rules, Badminton, Bandy, Baseball, Basketball, Beach volleyball, Boxing, Cricket, Cycling, Darts, Field hockey, Floorball, Futsal, Golf, Handball, Horse racing, Ice hockey, Martial arts, Motorsports, Politics, Pool, Rink hockey, Rowing, Rugby, Sailing, Snooker, Soccer, Squash, Swimming, Table tennis, Tennis, Trotting, Volleyball, Water polo, Winter sports | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bonuses and Free Bets |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonus / Free bet Size or maximum size of the bonus or free bet offered by the bookmaker. |
up to 550 PLN | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible Customers eligible for the bonus or free bet, which can either be new or existing ones. |
New customers | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cashable If bonuses or free bets are cashable, they can be withdrawn with the winnings after completing the rollover. If they are non-cashable, only winnings are withdrawable. |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description: Cashback if the first bet is lost • Minimum odds: 2.00 • Rollover: 8x bonus • Minimum deposit: 1 PLN • Countries: Poland only • T&Cs apply | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonus / Free bet Size or maximum size of the bonus or free bet offered by the bookmaker. |
up to 150 EUR | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible Customers eligible for the bonus or free bet, which can either be new or existing ones. |
New customers | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cashable If bonuses or free bets are cashable, they can be withdrawn with the winnings after completing the rollover. If they are non-cashable, only winnings are withdrawable. |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description: 50% bonus on the first deposit • Minimum odds: 2.00 • Rollover: 8x bonus • Minimum deposit: 20 EUR • Payment methods: Neteller, paysafecard, Skrill excluded • Countries: Italy only • T&Cs apply | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonus / Free bet Size or maximum size of the bonus or free bet offered by the bookmaker. |
up to 100 EUR | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible Customers eligible for the bonus or free bet, which can either be new or existing ones. |
New customers | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cashable If bonuses or free bets are cashable, they can be withdrawn with the winnings after completing the rollover. If they are non-cashable, only winnings are withdrawable. |
No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description: Place your first bet and get a freebet of 100% • Minimum odds: 1.50 • Rollover: 1x bonus • Minimum deposit: 1 EUR • Countries: UK, Finland, Norway, Malta, Canada excluded • T&Cs apply | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonus / Free bet Size or maximum size of the bonus or free bet offered by the bookmaker. |
up to 100 EUR | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible Customers eligible for the bonus or free bet, which can either be new or existing ones. |
New customers | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cashable If bonuses or free bets are cashable, they can be withdrawn with the winnings after completing the rollover. If they are non-cashable, only winnings are withdrawable. |
No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description: Risk free first bet • Minimum odds: 1.50 • Rollover: 3x bonus • Minimum deposit: 10 EUR • Countries: France only • T&Cs apply | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonus / Free bet Size or maximum size of the bonus or free bet offered by the bookmaker. |
up to 20 EUR | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible Customers eligible for the bonus or free bet, which can either be new or existing ones. |
New customers | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cashable If bonuses or free bets are cashable, they can be withdrawn with the winnings after completing the rollover. If they are non-cashable, only winnings are withdrawable. |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description: Cashback if the first bet is lost • Minimum odds: 2.00 • Rollover: 1x bonus • Minimum deposit: 20 EUR • Countries: Portugal only • T&Cs apply |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Strengths and Weaknessesbased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
Strongest sides of BetClic based on feedback collected from users. Significant strengthsN/A |
Significant Weaknesses
Weakest sides of BetClic based on feedback collected from users. N/A |
|
Other strong sides of BetClic based on feedback collected from users. Moderate strengthsN/A |
Moderate Weaknesses
Other weak sides of BetClic based on feedback collected from users. website usability sports coverage odds quality |
Overall qualitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
Overall Quality Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the overall quality of BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
20%
13% 33% 9% 25%
BetClic Average
|
|
Website lookbased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
8% below average
Website Look Ratings
Distribution of the ratings regarding the visual appeal of BetClic website, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
11%
42% 21% 16% 11%
BetClic Average
|
|
Website usabilitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
11% below average
Website Usability Ratings
Distribution of the ratings regarding the navigation and content organization of BetClic website, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
11%
37% 26% 16% 11%
BetClic Average
|
|
Website functionalitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
3% below average
Website functionality Ratings
Distribution of the ratings regarding the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of BetClic website, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
21%
42% 26% 11% 0%
BetClic Average
|
|
Sports coveragebased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
11% below average
Sports Coverage Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
0%
53% 26% 11% 11%
BetClic Average
|
|
Markets coveragebased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
3% below average
Markets Coverage Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the variety of betting markets offered by BetClic on one event, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
0%
37% 42% 21% 0%
BetClic Average
|
|
Odds qualitybased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
20% below average
Odds quality Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the quality of betting odds offered by BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
0%
16% 47% 37% 0%
BetClic Average
|
|
Betting limitsbased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
same as average
Betting Limits Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the maximum betting limits of BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
21%
42% 16% 11% 11%
BetClic Average
|
|
Live bettingbased on feedback collected from users |
|
Live streamingbased on feedback collected from users |
|
Customer Servicebased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
3% above average
Customer Service Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the customer service quality of BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
17%
44% 11% 17% 11%
BetClic Average
|
|
Bonuses and promotionsbased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
4% above average
Bonuses and Promotions Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the bonuses and promotions offered by BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
0%
11% 74% 11% 5%
BetClic Average
|
|
Safety and fairnessbased on feedback collected from users |
|
|
3% above average
Safety and Fairness Ratings Distribution of the ratings regarding the safety, fairness and overall credibility of BetClic, compared to the average bookmaker. Loading...
5
4 3 2 1
5%
37% 42% 16% 0%
BetClic Average
|
|
| pt220401 | 4 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Apr 25, 2022 ● User's IP address: 188.83.*.*
|
|
| N/A | 2 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Apr 28, 2021 ● User's IP address: 85.221.*.*
|
|
| SonicPeru | 3 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Dec 26, 2019 ● User's IP address: 190.43.*.*
|
|
| gb191001 | 3 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Oct 6, 2019 ● User's IP address: 79.71.*.*
|
|
| N/A | 1 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Sep 16, 2019 ● User's IP address: 5.62.*.*
|
|
| Rich | 1 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Jun 6, 2019 ● User's IP address: 86.45.*.*
|
|
| N/A | 1 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Mar 19, 2019 ● User's IP address: 87.116.*.*
|
|
| N/A | 3 |
Rating submitted in:  ● Date: Mar 13, 2019 ● User's IP address: 134.119.*.*
|
|
| N/A | 3 |
|
Rating submitted in: ● Date: Feb 7, 2019 ● User's IP address: 185.136.*.*
|
|
| de190102 | 5 |
|
Rating submitted in: ● Date: Jan 11, 2019 ● User's IP address: 185.220.*.*
|
|
| SonicPeru I like this |
|
Review submitted in: ● Date: Dec 26, 2019 ● User's IP address: 190.43.*.*
|
| The website is friendly, the Android application too, the problem is that not all games have streaming and none have video streaming. |
| Rich I like this |
|
Review submitted in: ● Date: Jun 6, 2019 ● User's IP address: 86.45.*.*
|
| They limited my account after just a few 50 euro bets with short odds. Worst bookie I have ever dealt with. They refused to look into the matter when I asked them to review my account. |
| Faguooo I like this |
Review submitted in:  ● Date: Mar 22, 2017 ● User's IP address: 176.57.*.*
|
| Safe, great usability (website+application), easy to withdraw money, lot of choices. I recommend it. (French user). |
| SayWhat I like this |
Review submitted in:  ● Date: Jul 22, 2016 ● User's IP address: 46.246.*.*
|
| BetClic is same as Expekt. Com. But Bonuses are lower here than on Expekt, booth sign up bonus and other kind of bonus. Cannot withdraw from iPad or Smartphone - only from desktop and that's the biggest reason not to play at BetClic as I see it. |
| Sweet35 I like this |
Review submitted in:  ● Date: Apr 13, 2016 ● User's IP address: 5.254.*.*
|
| I like this bookie, easy and fast deposits, traditional design, and good market for live section, although unlike pinnacle, here they have maximum winnings, moreover they dropped my maximum bet almost every month. |
| totoboy I like this |
Review submitted in:  ● Date: Mar 24, 2016 ● User's IP address: 5.79.*.*
|
| This is not looking good for BetClic. They had a big share of the market, were sponsoring Juventus, but at this moment business is not looking good for BetClic. They have lost many customers in Europe. We also see that hey have stopped with their daily free rolls at poker. BetClic was once a great provider but now middle class. Still they are reliable, good service and good odds. They don't always offer all bets and all competitions. |
| Vecchia questione I like this |
Review submitted in:  ● Date: Feb 18, 2016 ● User's IP address: 79.37.*.*
|
| Of all the sites where I have an account, Betclic is one to which I have to give the lowest rating. The main reason is that the odds are always the lowest. It offers a few types of play, for example, there is no Asian handicap and over. |
| BillyBoy I like this |
| Review submitted in: N/A ● Date: Feb 17, 2016 ● User's IP address: 83.254.*.* |
| It's a shame for a bookie like BetClic have only make cashout available from desktop and not the iOS or Android app. Bonus is OK, Customer Support very nice, but the limited way for cash-out make my rating for BetClic low, especially when cash IN to the iOS App or from an Android is working without any problems. |
| richey I like this |
|
Review submitted in: ● Date: Dec 28, 2015 ● User's IP address: 92.30.*.*
|
| I've been trying to withdraw for two years and no luck. A small amount as well, they keep charging me a fiver a year for not betting even though they won't let me withdraw. It's like theft because I contact them and nothing gets sorted. I am a member of lots of bookmakers they are in the bottom three for sure. |
| stefan I like this |
|
Review submitted in: ● Date: May 25, 2015 ● User's IP address: 79.116.*.*
|
| Very small offer on live betting, very small offer on tennis. They canceled some of my bets but then, after I e-mailed them, they gave me money. I don't recommend them! |
| Marius9.ym | 3 |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 77.232.*.*
|
|
| Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 3 |
| The website looks... Good, but it can look better. That website is too white and if you use it for many hours, it won't be great for your eyes. | |
| Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
| It's easy to use, I like that on the home page they present some of the most important games that are about to start, also some stats/highlights from the live events available at that moment - along with some status: the most played bets. | |
| Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 3 |
| Good. It would be very good if the loading time was faster. Sometimes the website loads very slowly, there are broken links and the translations in Romanian are awful in some sections. It's ok, but sometimes it looks like it should need some fixes. | |
| Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 2 |
| They have a weak coverage from my point of view. It happened so many times I had money in my betclic account and wanted to bet on some volleyball, tennis or even football matches - and I couldn't because they weren't in the betting offer. Betclic mostly provides popular sports events from big leagues & tournaments. It's a pity. | |
| Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 2 |
| Good only for football. For other types of sports it's a disaster. Betclic is that type of bookie for those who get satisfied with few types of bets/markets. | |
| Live betting Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's live (in-play, in-running) betting service. | 2 |
| I've used it - on my desktop and mobile. The mobile version is useless - it takes half an hour to place a bet (many errors, bad loading time etc. ). The desktop version is ok, but it has very few events, there aren't too many betting options and the odds are low. You must be crazy to consider betclic to have a good live betting coverage and offer. | |
| Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 3 |
| I like the odds for under/over goals in football (they have some nice lines there) - but in the rest most of the odds were lower than a big part of those offered by other bookies. | |
| Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 3 |
| I haven't been limited so far. | |
| Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 3 |
| I've contacted them only via email and they were nice. Andrei, the Romanian operator is nice. | |
| Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 3 |
| Their welcome bonus is small, but attractive. So, what you must do is to make a deposit and place a bet up to 10 EUR. If you lose your first bet, they give you back the stake (real money, not freebet, bonus or something like this). Also, they deliver many free spins in casino and games. 2 days ago I've received 10 free spins in casino. | |
| Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 4 |
| No need to doubt Betclic. It's a safe and reliable bookie. They always paid me really fast, never had any problems. | |
| hutch | |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 86.143.*.*
|
|
| levan | |
Review submitted in:  ● User's IP address: 216.185.*.*
|
|
| Henry-VIII | |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 63.141.*.*
|
|
| mr-prasad | 4 |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 69.22.*.*
|
|
| Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 5 |
| Super looking site with super graphics. It looks very flashy and dynamic at least at first glance. | |
| Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 2 |
| Very Las Vegasey looking with flash graphics, but they've missed an essential ingredient, the search box, making it very time consuming to find bets. Not good for easy navigation or content. | |
| Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 3 |
| Too much graphics contribute to slower loading times than some other sites, including those of smaller operators, but still good enough. | |
| Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 4 |
| Yes, it has a good healthy level of events you can bet on. | |
| Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 4 |
| Yes, there is a good and healthy level of these being offered in betclic. | |
| Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 4 |
| The odds if you look in the right places, usually in match betting are often of close to arb quality but not quite. The 4 rating is based on the odds I dig out and get, rather than what's generally offered on the site though. | |
| Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 3 |
| Limits are high but not totally irresponsible, preventing people from losing 2 years wages on odds on shot or something, mind you if you kept betting, it's far from foolproof and any idiot with money to burn could easily get round it by back a string of bets. | |
| Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 4 |
| Customer Service does an excellent job of being polite to customers, albeit while taking hard earned cash from not so savvy punters. You can reach them on chat in about 40 seconds waiting time. | |
| Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 3 |
| Around 30 to 35 euros depending on time of year, need for new business, etc. | |
| Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 4 |
| They pay out so they play it fair. | |
| spadoni | 4 |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 81.151.*.*
|
|
| Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
| Very professionally designed site with its marcus desailly themed pages, yeah I like it. | |
| Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
| Not that much to say on the subject, except that there were no problems with navigating or finding one's way round and the content was organised in the standard way you would expect. | |
| Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 4 |
| It loaded painlessly and the betting software worked fine once you got to grips with how it works. Links and pages go hand in hand without any issues. | |
| Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 4 |
| Events coverage, as well as sports and leagues coverage was extensive and on an international scale. | |
| Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 3 |
| Live streaming Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's live streaming service. | 4 |
| I was impressed with Live Streaming quality and coverage. | |
| Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 3 |
| Only the top positions were really worth considering as a professional punter. | |
| Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 3 |
| Usually a good few hundred euros or so. | |
| Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 4 |
| The live chat link is the best way to get in touch. | |
| Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 3 |
| You can earn yourself 30 euros in free bets here! | |
| Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 3 |
| Although if you operate in the haphazard style of many a weekend punter, it's downright dangerous, it is safe enough to just bet on your favourite team as long as it's a negligible stake. Betting as a professional punter in maybe some of the ways I outline are pretty safe, but there is still some element of risk even then and you have to discipline yourself to close out of losing trades ASAP. The key to good trading is cutting losses and maximising winning trades. | |
| rick | |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 86.162.*.*
|
|
| Khan-khan | |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 81.159.*.*
|
|
| kouk-lo | |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 31.53.*.*
|
|
| dinamo17 | 2 |
|
Review submitted in: ● User's IP address: 5.13.*.*
|
|
| Website look Evaluates the visual appeal of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
| Website design is deplorable. | |
| Website usability Evaluates the navigation and content organization of the bookmaker's website. | 1 |
| It's difficult to navigate the website and the content organization is too heavy. | |
| Website functionality Evaluates the loading time, betting software quality and general performance of the bookmaker's website. | 2 |
| They had some problems, but now, the loading time and the functionality of the betting software are satisfactory. | |
| Sports coverage Evaluates the variety of sports, leagues and events offered by the bookmaker. | 1 |
| They have one of the weakest offers. | |
| Markets coverage Evaluates the variety of betting markets offered by the bookmaker on one event. | 2 |
| I think the betting markets are just satisfactory, because sometimes the odds are too low. | |
| Live betting Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's live (in-play, in-running) betting service. | 3 |
| I don't use live betting with this bookmaker, but from what I've seen, the coverage and the quality are good. | |
| Odds quality Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's betting odds. | 3 |
| Odds are good, but not as good as compared to other bookmakers. | |
| Betting limits Evaluates the bookmaker's maximum bet limits. | 4 |
| There are no notable restrictions. | |
| Customer service Evaluates the quality of bookmaker's customer service. | 1 |
| The customer service is one of the weakest. | |
| Bonuses and promos Evaluates the bookmaker's offer of bonuses and promotions. | 3 |
| They had excellent bonuses and promotions, but at present they aren't so good. | |
| Safety and fairness Evaluates the bookmaker's safety, fairness and overall credibility. | 3 |
| Just good - I have some friends who had some problems with them. | |
